Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Worked on the prologue to Heroes and Time Travelers this morning and it opens with Jennifer breaking up with Marty, which, I feel is justified not only for how their relationship is headed in the comic but also how I tend to interpret Jennifer as a character with her own agency.

The thing is, it's been clear to me for a long time that Jen is happy on the slow path. As she tells Marty in the Heroes and Time Travelers: the world is enough for her. She doesn't need to go galavanting off in time to appreciate life the way Marty and Doc do. She's capable of living in the here and now, which is something Marty genuinely has trouble doing.

If she's going to have agency, the first thing that needs to happen is for her to have her own desires and motivations outside of being with Marty. She has to want things that have nothing to do with him, and to that extent I've felt like that would mean distancing herself romantically from him. She will always have his back in 1986. If he needs her help on an adventure she'll be there, because she's still his friend and biggest fan. She wants him to succeed and be happy even if it means not being together. The Leona Lewis song "I Got You" is what comes to mind when I think about their platonic relationship in 1986:

A place to crash/ I got you/ no need to ask/ I got you/...what's weird about it/is we're right at the end/ not mad about it/ just figured it out in my head/ I'm proud to say/ I got you

It just means a lot to me that there are no hard feelings, that going their own ways doesn't mean they'll abandon one another when the chips are down.

(I will admit, I'm biased. I've been lucky to have very few ugly break-ups, and I try not to project but, come on, can you imagine these two being angry at each other for more than 72 hours? I thought not.)
In a totally unrelated topic, I promised to re-post/expand on a Detroit Become Human meta I started on my Tumblr, about the role of compassion in self awareness/deviancy.

It makes sense, as AI become more and more of a reality that their first real field tests be in the medical profession. Japan is already field testing robotic AI in nursing and senior care homes due to the fact that the medical field experiences the most burn-out and job turnover. Medicine is an overworked, underpaid and understaffed profession already. Imagine what it will be like by the time DBH becomes a reality.

The one thing we have failed to do so far is to instill even a false sense of compassion or bedside manner in an AI, but what happens when we do? It's naive to expect that instilling an AI with a sense of compassion won't one day lead to those feelings "becoming real." We cannot program AI for compassionate care and then be shocked when this leads to self awareness because the root of compassion is and of itself, awareness of things beyond the self. And for things to exist beyond the self, awareness of the self must already be present.

I've read all the game lore about Markus being a new prototype specifically created to match Carl, but all three of the playable characters have a pre-established sense of care: Kara is Alice's caretaker, Markus is Carl's and Connor is created to protect humans (a form of care) from deviant androids.

Markus doesn't want to harm humans because he was built to care for one. Unless the player chooses him to, he won't: pacifism is written all over his narrative. If you proceed in a way that feels the most natural for who Markus was before he went deviant, it feels genuinely out of character for him to be violent unless there is literally no other choice. Kara is presented with many of the same choices but Alice being a factor makes her route more nuanced if you look at her path decision-to-decision. The same with Connor. It always struck me as ironic that the character whose actions have the most influence over the narrative as a whole has the least nuanced decisions, especially if you follow the pacifist path. (Almost like saying pacifism is more natural to the human condition than violence. How zen.)

Before Detroit Become Human becomes the future, we need to learn from the philosophical questions it posits: if we create AI to work in a field that requires compassion we cannot react with fear when that compassion leads directly to self awareness. If compassion is a "deviant" behavior then we must face the reality that as a race we have accepted violence and conflict as the norm.
Lord help me I'm back on my BttF bullshit.

I re-read the Who Is Marty Mcfly arc of the comic and I hold to my belief that it was too short for it's own good and the parallels between Irving and Citizen Brown don't hold up as well as they could because Citizen Brown was a man who had been emotionally abused and mentally warped since he was seventeen years old and Irving was just a raging ego-maniac who took his failure out on Doc by deciding to go after Marty, gaslight him and emotionally manipulate him in order to gain access to the flux capacitor as well as Marty's undying loyalty and affection. The implications of that arc and Irving as a character were not plumbed nearly as deeply as they should have been, especially it's effect on Marty's psyche. He was effectively stalked and manipulated for weeks, and it will always feel out of character for Doc to "keep Irving around" especially when the beginning of the next arc proves that Irving has learned nothing and should never be granted access to Marty, like, ever.

It's understandable that Citizen Brown became who he did under Edna's influence, but Irving had no such excuse; he was just like that. And despite external similarities the two are nothing alike, Irving is far worse and more dangerous and it will never sit right with me that the comic treats them as equally worthy of redemption.

Profile

raesoflight

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Oct. 30th, 2026 08:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios